Television is "bad teacher" ?
Reflections and considerations.
Compared to television of the sixties, who had a key function of the service, the current is essentially characterized by the logic of consumption.
Great and important means of communication, the television was, in our country, from the '60s onwards, an instrument of cultural progress. But it is also undeniable that the TV, information service and entertainment, is turning only entertainment at all costs and more harmful in the sense of the word.
The current decay is stigmatized, in a bleak but clear, in terms of newly minted "trash TV" and "Trash" . The question
if television is or is not "bad teacher" is now open for a few years, and that is since we realized that the main cause of deterioration of the TV was the very high production by television stations, the material always poorer and sensational, only to increase and maintain their audience.
aim, therefore, has failed to require that to gain more viewers, entering into a maelstrom of competition, regardless of the educational purpose of the medium. Does not matter then, if the material is good or not so sensational. The important thing is to involve as many as possible "teleutenti.
Nonostante il livello basso di molte trasmissioni televisive, tuttavia, ci si rende sempre più conto di come il pubblico sembri apprezzare spettacoli dalle loro qualità scadenti.
Chi fa televisione, a mio parere, dovrebbe quindi cercare individuare ciò che dovrebbe essere evitato il più possibile, in modo tale da poter continuare a svolgere a pieno la sua funzione non solo di intrattenimento ma soprattutto educativa.
La TV dunque, proprio per il suo peso non indifferente che ha assunto anche nei confronti dei più giovani, dovrebbe essere usata con moderazione, e in tal senso credo che l’intervento della famiglia potrebbe essere determinante, in modo tale da formare i figli and moderate to critical use of media and explain the purposes of certain television broadcasts, which often go to distort the principles and core values.
Finally, I believe that low-level programs, such as those that recently we usually see, in no small way arrest the growth of a country and a civil society.
A boy who does not have a definite personality certainly does not help even in the current TV series or cartoons.
The fact that these transmissions have a good audience could cause us to think that the situation is more serious than it actually is, or maybe that really there's nothing on TV and that even something us slaves of the tube we see?
I think it's difficult to answer this question on two feet, as well as the initial one, if your television is or is not "bad teacher."
conclude, therefore, reiterating that the producers of television programs, in my view, should act as a first goal, the prohibition of giving life to shows or programs with strong anti-educational functions, thereby restoring the important role that this medium was initially thought, and reflecting on the heavy burden which today has taken the television in society and in the process of shaping the character of today's generations.
Great and important means of communication, the television was, in our country, from the '60s onwards, an instrument of cultural progress. But it is also undeniable that the TV, information service and entertainment, is turning only entertainment at all costs and more harmful in the sense of the word.
The current decay is stigmatized, in a bleak but clear, in terms of newly minted "trash TV" and "Trash" . The question
if television is or is not "bad teacher" is now open for a few years, and that is since we realized that the main cause of deterioration of the TV was the very high production by television stations, the material always poorer and sensational, only to increase and maintain their audience.
aim, therefore, has failed to require that to gain more viewers, entering into a maelstrom of competition, regardless of the educational purpose of the medium. Does not matter then, if the material is good or not so sensational. The important thing is to involve as many as possible "teleutenti.
Nonostante il livello basso di molte trasmissioni televisive, tuttavia, ci si rende sempre più conto di come il pubblico sembri apprezzare spettacoli dalle loro qualità scadenti.
Chi fa televisione, a mio parere, dovrebbe quindi cercare individuare ciò che dovrebbe essere evitato il più possibile, in modo tale da poter continuare a svolgere a pieno la sua funzione non solo di intrattenimento ma soprattutto educativa.
La TV dunque, proprio per il suo peso non indifferente che ha assunto anche nei confronti dei più giovani, dovrebbe essere usata con moderazione, e in tal senso credo che l’intervento della famiglia potrebbe essere determinante, in modo tale da formare i figli and moderate to critical use of media and explain the purposes of certain television broadcasts, which often go to distort the principles and core values.
Finally, I believe that low-level programs, such as those that recently we usually see, in no small way arrest the growth of a country and a civil society.
A boy who does not have a definite personality certainly does not help even in the current TV series or cartoons.
The fact that these transmissions have a good audience could cause us to think that the situation is more serious than it actually is, or maybe that really there's nothing on TV and that even something us slaves of the tube we see?
I think it's difficult to answer this question on two feet, as well as the initial one, if your television is or is not "bad teacher."
conclude, therefore, reiterating that the producers of television programs, in my view, should act as a first goal, the prohibition of giving life to shows or programs with strong anti-educational functions, thereby restoring the important role that this medium was initially thought, and reflecting on the heavy burden which today has taken the television in society and in the process of shaping the character of today's generations.
0 comments:
Post a Comment